Pricing & Cost9 min read·Updated 2026-04-30

Clay Pricing 2026: Credits Explained, Plans Compared

The most confusing pricing in the outbound stack, broken down clearly -- credits, plans, waterfall math, and real-world cost examples.

RB

Rees Bayba

Founder, Astra GTM

TL;DR

  • Clay simplified to two plans in March 2026: Launch ($185/mo, 10,000 credits) and Growth ($495/mo, 25,000 credits). Four previous tiers collapsed into two.
  • Credits are consumed per action attempt -- not per success. Running a 3-provider waterfall where all three fail costs credits for all three attempts.
  • Data costs dropped 50-90% across most providers in the March 2026 overhaul. What cost 5 credits now costs 1-2 on most providers.
  • Enriching 1,000 contacts with email + LinkedIn + AI research costs roughly $150-300 in credits at the Growth plan, depending on hit rates.
  • Reduce credit waste with fallback logic (only run Provider B if Provider A returns null), batch processing, and result caching.
  • Free trial: 100 credits, enough for 20-30 enrichments with a simple workflow.

Clay is the most powerful enrichment and workflow tool in modern outbound -- and it has the most confusing pricing. The credit system trips up almost everyone when they first use it. This guide explains exactly how credits work, what the March 2026 overhaul changed, and how to estimate costs before you commit.

The March 2026 Pricing Overhaul

Clay restructured their pricing in March 2026. The previous four-tier model (Free, Starter, Explorer, Pro) collapsed into two paid plans. Data costs dropped 50-90% across most providers. The credit system itself stayed the same, but the amount you get per dollar improved significantly.

PlanMonthly priceCredits includedCredit overage costBest for
Launch$185/mo10,000 credits$0.03/creditSolo operators, small teams, testing workflows before scaling
Growth$495/mo25,000 credits$0.02/creditFull outbound teams, multi-provider waterfalls, regular bulk enrichment

Annual billing saves approximately 20% on both plans. Clay does not offer a team or agency tier separate from Growth -- agencies managing multiple clients typically run Growth with credit top-ups as needed.

How the Credit System Works

Every action you take in Clay costs credits. This is the part that confuses people: credits are consumed per attempt, not per result. If you search a provider for an email address and nothing comes back, you still pay the credits for the attempt. This is the source of most Clay billing surprises.

Think of credits like API calls. You pay for the request regardless of whether the data exists. The provider has to do the lookup either way -- Clay passes that cost to you.

Credit Costs by Action

As of March 2026, after the data cost reduction:

Action typeCredits per attemptNotes
Basic enrichment (company info, firmographics)0.5-2 creditsClearbit, Clay native data sources. Cheapest actions.
Email finding2-5 creditsApollo, Hunter, Snov. Varies by provider. Charged per attempt even if no email found.
LinkedIn data (profile, company)3-5 creditsLinkedIn scraping via Clay's native integrations. Profile views cost more than company lookups.
AI Claygent research5-10 creditsGPT-4o-powered agent that browses the web. Costs depend on research complexity and how many pages it visits.
Phone number finding3-8 creditsMobile enrichment via providers like Datagma. Higher per-credit than email.
Intent data5-15 creditsBombora, G2, and similar. Most expensive enrichment category.

The Waterfall Math Problem

A waterfall in Clay means: try Provider A, and if it returns nothing, try Provider B, and if that returns nothing, try Provider C. This is how you maximize email find rates -- but it multiplies credit costs when all providers fail.

Example: you run a 3-provider email waterfall (Apollo at 3 credits, Hunter at 4 credits, Snov at 3 credits). On a contact where all three providers return nothing, you spend 10 credits and get no data. On a list of 1,000 contacts where 40% are not findable by any provider, that 40% costs you 4,000 credits in failed attempts alone.

Rule of thumb: budget 50% more credits than you think you need when running waterfalls. The hit rate on any given provider is 40-70% -- misses are a normal part of enrichment, not an exception.

$495/month
Clay Growth plan, including 25,000 credits

At Growth plan pricing with 25,000 credits, basic enrichment for 1,000 contacts (email + LinkedIn) costs roughly 5,000-8,000 credits depending on waterfall depth and hit rates. The plan covers 3-5 full batches of 1,000 contacts per month, or more if your hit rates are high.

Real-World Cost Example: 1,000 Contacts

Scenario: you want to enrich 1,000 contacts with verified email, LinkedIn profile data, and AI research on each company. Here is the math at Growth plan pricing.

  1. 1Email waterfall (2 providers): 2,000-4,000 credits. Assume 60% found on first provider (1,200 credits), 30% require second provider (900 credits), 10% not found (200 credits wasted). Total: ~2,300 credits.
  2. 2LinkedIn profile data: 3-5 credits per contact. 1,000 contacts = 3,000-5,000 credits.
  3. 3AI Claygent research (company-level, one per unique company): assume 700 unique companies at 7 credits each = 4,900 credits.
  4. 4Total: approximately 10,200-12,200 credits for the full workflow.
  5. 5At Growth plan ($495/mo, 25,000 credits): this workflow fits inside the plan. At Launch ($185/mo, 10,000 credits): it would consume the full month's credits on one batch.
  6. 6Add email verification via a separate tool (BounceBan, ZeroBounce): this is not a Clay action, billed separately.

Bottom line: enriching 1,000 contacts with email + LinkedIn + AI research costs approximately 10,000-12,000 Clay credits, which is $200-360 at Growth plan overage rates, or fits inside the plan's monthly credit allowance. The exact cost depends heavily on your waterfall depth and the quality of your list.

How to Reduce Credit Waste

Six concrete ways to stretch your Clay credits:

  • Use fallback logic: configure each Clay column to only run if the previous provider returned null. Never run Provider B on contacts where Provider A already succeeded.
  • Start cheap, go expensive: order your waterfall from cheapest to most expensive provider. Use Apollo (3 credits) before Hunter (4 credits) before AI Claygent (7+ credits).
  • Batch process, do not real-time enrich: run enrichment on full batches weekly rather than row-by-row as contacts enter your table. Prevents duplicate enrichment attempts.
  • Cache results: Clay stores results in your table. Do not re-enrich contacts that already have a value in the column unless the data is explicitly stale.
  • Qualify before enriching: run a cheap qualification step first (company headcount from Clay's free data, industry filter) and only enrich contacts that pass. Do not run full enrichment on every import.
  • Use Clay's built-in dedup: remove duplicate contacts before enrichment. Running the same email lookup twice is 2x the credits for 0x extra value.

Free Trial

Clay's free trial gives you 100 credits. That is enough for approximately 20-30 enrichments with a simple single-provider workflow, or 10-15 enrichments with a 2-provider waterfall. It is enough to validate that your data sources return usable results for your ICP -- not enough to run a full enrichment batch. Upgrade to Launch or Growth before running any production workflow.

Frequently asked questions

How many credits do I need per month?

Depends entirely on your workflow. A simple single-provider email lookup on 500 contacts per month needs 1,000-2,500 credits -- Launch plan covers it. A full waterfall (email + LinkedIn + AI research) on 1,000 contacts needs 10,000-15,000 credits -- Growth plan covers it. Run your expected workflow on a 20-contact test batch first and multiply by your expected monthly volume.

What happens if I go over my plan's credit limit?

Clay charges overage rates: $0.03/credit on Launch, $0.02/credit on Growth. Overages are billed at the end of the month. There is no hard cap -- Clay does not stop your workflows when credits run out, it charges the overage. Keep an eye on your usage dashboard, especially when running a new workflow for the first time.

Is Clay worth it compared to just buying a list from Apollo?

Different tools, different use cases. Apollo sells you contacts from its database with whatever data it has. Clay enriches contacts from any source using 50+ data providers, applies your custom logic, and lets you run AI research that no static database can match. Clay is worth it when you need signal-based personalization (job change alerts, funding news, technographic data layered together). Apollo is worth it for high-volume outreach where contact data alone is sufficient.

Does Clay offer a free trial?

Yes. Clay gives you 100 free credits on signup, no credit card required. It is enough to test a workflow on a small batch of contacts and verify your data sources return useful results. Not enough for production use.

How much does credit overage cost?

Launch plan: $0.03 per credit over the 10,000 monthly limit. Growth plan: $0.02 per credit over the 25,000 monthly limit. At Growth plan overage rates, 10,000 extra credits costs $200. If you are consistently hitting overages, upgrading the plan almost always costs less than paying overage rates.

How do I estimate my credit usage before committing to a plan?

Take a representative sample of 20-50 contacts that match your typical ICP. Build your intended workflow (email lookup, LinkedIn, whatever else you need). Run it on that sample. Divide total credits consumed by contacts processed to get your per-contact rate. Multiply by your monthly volume. Add 50% buffer for waterfall misses and re-runs. That is your monthly credit estimate.

Want this built for your team?

We implement these systems end-to-end. First sends within 14 days.